Syria Media Roundup (29/ 5 / 2013)-‎ ‎ The Syrian Conflict extends to Lebanon, “false” policies of the head of the National Coalition – ‎regime plans to attack Aleppo and a new initiative to create a no-fly zone

As the Washington post reports, the FSA or General Salim Idriss threatened Hisbollah with ‎retaliation attacks if it does not withdraw from Syrian territory. Since the shooting of ‎Lebanese soldiers on Tuesday, fears that Lebanon could be drawn into a sectarian civil war are ‎rising. Since the beginning of the revolution, Lebanon takes the stance […]

As the Washington post reports, the FSA or General Salim Idriss threatened Hisbollah with ‎retaliation attacks if it does not withdraw from Syrian territory. Since the shooting of ‎Lebanese soldiers on Tuesday, fears that Lebanon could be drawn into a sectarian civil war are ‎rising. Since the beginning of the revolution, Lebanon takes the stance of neutrality which ‎becomes increasingly difficult to maintain as different factions of Lebanese society position ‎themselves with or against the regime.‎

While it is not clear who is responsible for the military attack on the soldiers, the attack points to ‎the fragility of the Lebanese state. ‎Along the same lines, Joshua Landis argues that the “Syrian Civil War” is ‎increasingly extending towards Lebanon. According to him Alawites in Tripoli are not only ‎attacking Sunni parts but nearly all parts of the city. Expectations that the Lebanese army could ‎broker a cease-fire were not met. ‎

Meanwhile the National Coalition met in Istanbul to expand and widen its support base and ‎representativeness. Syria Deeply gives an insight to these meetings. The initial ‎plan, agreed upon by members of the National Coalition including the Muslim Brotherhood, ‎stated that 32 new members should be included. ‎ However, the secretary general of the National Coalition rejected this plan on Friday while ‎coming up with a new plan which guarantees the Muslim Brotherhood two thirds of seats. ‎

Hassan explains these efforts of the Brotherhood to gain more influence as a continuation of ‎earlier “false” practices. Apparently, the secretary general of the National Coalition Al-Sabbagh ‎was appointed as representing “local councils” when in fact many of the people he claimed to ‎represent were his employees from Saudi Arabia.

Syrians themselves know about this position of ‎Sabbagh while Turkey, Qatar and the Muslim Brotherhood insist that he leads the National ‎Coalition. These positions therefore would completely undermine the credibility of the National ‎Coalition as a representative body of the Syrian opposition. ‎Representativeness thereby is important in order to be able to deal with other (western) powers ‎and take further political decisions. According to Hassan, the importance of the Brotherhood and ‎its ability to remain strong within the coalition is due to Turkey’s and Qatar’s influence as the ‎Brotherhood does not have a strong support base in Syria. Further developments show that Al-‎Sabbagh tries to hold his power in the National Coalition despite his knowledge that this might ‎eventually weaken the opposition and strengthen Assad.‎ Adopt a Revolution already published the statement by opposition networks who are ‎criticizing the recent inability of the National Coalition on taking any political steps. ‎

The English Al Akhbar reports on another note that after the heavy bombardment of Qusair, regime troops ‎are preparing to launch an attack on Aleppo by surrounding the city in order to cut off the ‎supplies of the opposition. Also, there seem to be new ‎clashes between FSA brigades and Kurdish fighters who are part of the YPG. This is not the first ‎time that attacks on Kurdish villages are carried out. Yet, it is not merely Kurds fighting against ‎the FSA as the situation is more complex. There are Kurdish brigades who fight alongside the FSA ‎but coordinate their actions with the YPG. The YPG again accuses the FSA of a plan to attack ‎villages under control of the YPG. ‎

Meanwhile, the Daily Beast reports about plans of President Obama on creating a no-fly zone in ‎Syria. Thereby, there have been demands by the white house for the pentagon to draw plans of a ‎possible no-fly zone. The question here is not if the United States is able to suppress the regime’s ‎air power which it can surely do without ground troops. Rather, it depends more on the will of ‎President Obama to carry out any of these measures. ‎